Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2002 16:43:03
>Only if you don't mean that:
>- You plan to copy /usr/bin back to /bin, NOR
>- You plan on doing SunOS' bonehead move that forced / and /usr to be
> mounted at the same time in order to get anything done.
>I'd strenuously object to that. I have my reasons for keeping / and /usr
>separate, and Sun's move in SunOS 4.x was the height of stupidity at the
>time, including making mknod a dynamically-linked executable (they
>mapped from /dev/zero; if /dev/zero didn't exist, you had to mknod it,
>but mknod was dynamically linked...). Please don't ask how /dev/zero
>disappeared. I have no idea.
sounds like that might have been another good candidate for solaris's
/usr/sbin/static tools. my solaris 8 machine has cp, ln, mv, rcp, and
tar in there.
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
firstname.lastname@example.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
email@example.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
firstname.lastname@example.org * "information is power -- share the wealth."