Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Johnny Billquist <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2002 21:27:59
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:08:40PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > Yes, and I'd consider that the correct behaviour, by the way. It's ugly,
> > but it's the right (actually the only) way it could be done. And
> > "exporting" symbols from the static program, while nice, could be lived
> > without as well.
> No, it's not correct behavior. There's the "which global variable do
> you use, errno or errno?" problem.
Ooops. I realized that, and others also already pointed it out.
errno (atleast) needs to be exported. Oh well, I stand (very) corrected on
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: firstname.lastname@example.org || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol