Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Bang Jun-Young <email@example.com>
From: Johnny Billquist <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/26/2002 20:48:12
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:20:05PM +0200, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> > then fix dlopen() instead.
> By embedding ld.so(1) in statically linked binary? I can't think of a
> better method other than that. ;-)
I can't really understand that smiley.
The point is that it's not the actual amount of code in the binary, but
that it shouldn't be dependant on other files.
If the easiest way of getting dlopen() to work is by linking in ld.so,
sure, why not?
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: email@example.com || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol