Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Lennart Augustsson <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2002 20:20:05
> > If I recall correctly, there was quite a bit of debate on this, and I
> > didn't see any clear rationale nor consensus. Admittedly the rationale
> > seems a bit more clear...
Why should using dlopen() require that the executable is dynamically
linked? Requiring this is, imo, broken. If using dlopen() is the
reason to go to a dynamically linked /bin, then fix dlopen() instead.