Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Noriyuki Soda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/26/2002 16:52:59
>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:42:22 +0900, email@example.com said:
> so, "make build" will do that "mv /lib/libc.so.major.minor /usr/lib"
> for us? if not, it will be an additional labor for people.
For people using official binary release, probably the right thing is
to remove older /lib/libc.so.major.minor, because we will never change
major number of libc.
I'm not sure about what is the right thing for people using binary
snapshot or "make build", though. I guess perhaps the extra labor
may be acceptable for those people.