Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Noriyuki Soda <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/26/2002 16:42:22
>>> + Shared libraries used by programs in /bin and /sbin have been
>>> moved from /usr/lib to /lib. Compatibility symbolic links are
>> looks to me that libc will be in /lib/libc.so, and /usr/lib/libc.so
>> will become a symlink to /lib/libc.so.
>Yes. Latest libc should belongs to /lib with luke's proposal.
>But older shlibs can be moved from /lib to /usr/lib safely.
>So, requirement for / partion shouldn't increase.
>(Rather, it should decrease according to luke's report).
so, "make build" will do that "mv /lib/libc.so.major.minor /usr/lib"
for us? if not, it will be an additional labor for people.