Subject: Re: UltraDMA problems under 1.6F (probably hardware)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <email@example.com>
Date: 08/14/2002 07:25:14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:02:01PM +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> | I just got reproducible UDMA errors (with downgrades following)
> | on a new Athlon system with a VIA8233A UDMA133 capable controller.
> FWIW, I've seen the same problem (on a system with an Asus A7V333 motherb=
Hrm. That's three different controllers, counting mine (Acer Labs
M5229 rev. 0xc4). Well, unless your Asus motherobard has a Via IDE
controller, Luke, of which there's a pretty fair chance.
Maybe I'll try trading the UDMA 66 10 GB drive with the UDMA 133
160(ish) GB drive to confirm Matthias's experience.
Orthogonally: do we even support UDMA 133 yet? (I remember reading
about stuff for UDMA 100 going in post-1.5, but I don't know that
I've seen any 133 talk go past.)
Perhaps importantly: do we support 48-bit LBA? (Yes, I could go look
for myself, but I'm at work right now.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----