--uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:02:01PM +1000, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
>   | I just got reproducible UDMA errors (with downgrades following)
>   | on a new Athlon system with a VIA8233A UDMA133 capable controller.
>=20
> FWIW, I've seen the same problem (on a system with an Asus A7V333 motherb=
oard).

Hrm. That's three different controllers, counting mine (Acer Labs
M5229 rev. 0xc4). Well, unless your Asus motherobard has a Via IDE
controller, Luke, of which there's a pretty fair chance.

Maybe I'll try trading the UDMA 66 10 GB drive with the UDMA 133
160(ish) GB drive to confirm Matthias's experience.

Orthogonally: do we even support UDMA 133 yet? (I remember reading
about stuff for UDMA 100 going in post-1.5, but I don't know that
I've seen any 133 talk go past.)

Perhaps importantly: do we support 48-bit LBA? (Yes, I could go look
for myself, but I'm at work right now.)

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9Wj4a9ehacAz5CRoRAr5lAJ0Ub5Rotm/VALyfEe9jqEBjdk+fPgCeMwOJ
osQETU+BFEYEV49NZcrDNfQ=
=uAI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ--