Subject: Re: NetBSD Security Advisory 2002-009: Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSL code
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Maxwell <email@example.com>
Date: 08/02/2002 18:30:29
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:11:12PM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:08:16PM -0400, David Maxwell wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:07:53PM +0200, Olaf Seibert wrote:
> > > On Fri 02 Aug 2002 at 09:57:28 -0400, NetBSD Security Officer wrote:
> > > | [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Aug 2 17:04:41 2002) --]
> > > | gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
> > > | gpg: Signature made Thu Aug 1 15:37:30 2002 CEST using RSA key ID F8376205
> > > | gpg: BAD signature from "firstname.lastname@example.org"
> > > ^^^
> I'd auto-check them if they had proper PGP/MIME headers...
I honestly don't know if I've ever discussed that with the other S-Os.
As far as I can remember, no advisory to date has been issued in a MIME
format. I will check and see if there's a reason for that.
My only guess is that it might have had to do with the general use of
MIME compatible MUAs growing over time, since the NetBSD S-O role began.
David Maxwell, email@example.comfirstname.lastname@example.org -->
Any sufficiently advanced Common Sense will seem like magic...