Subject: Re: -pipe significantly boosts up kernel compile speed
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Chuck Yerkes <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/04/2002 12:49:43
I can't really consider a 166MHz/64MB machine slow and small
(looking at my firewall appliance at 66MHz/32MB and dealing with
embedded systems with 8MB of RAM - granted then never compile anymore).
Getting old? Yes. "slow" not for my def of "slow".
Try building on a 32MB sparc 1 or 2 or a 486/50.
-pipe is good if you have RAM to spare. Perhaps it could be added
if there's a way to programatically check RAM size for > 128MB.
Quoting Bang Jun-Young (email@example.com):
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 09:26:09PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > I think you should also check it really faster even on slower
> > (and less memory) machines. Modern machines are always fast anyway :-)
> I have just tested with a plain old Pentium 166 machine that has 64MB of memory:
> With -pipe: 45:36
> Without -pipe: 1:13:48
> Obviously, -pipe was effective on a slow machine as well.
> One thing interesting here is, with -pipe swap size grew up to 10MB
> during build, while without -pipe no swapping occurred.