Subject: Re: NetBSD 1.6_BETA3 fails to build libc
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
Date: 06/28/2002 10:18:39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:25:17AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> > have you run "make includes"? /usr/include/netdb.h needs to be
> > in sync with libc source.
i did 'make includes' and tried to build libc again. it worked. but to
feel safe and have whole system consistent i rather did whole update
with build.sh, which worked fine so now i have up-to-date 1.6_BETA3
system (i start to like build.sh even more now ;), i can't remember the
last time it didn't work for me..)
> This is why one should always use make build or build.sh -- it
> prevents accidents. Even experts fail on this sort of thing.
well, i only followed the suggestions in SA.
> > maybe it's because libresolv advisory suggests "cvs update" only
> > under lib/libc/net. i apologize. i wonder if i should suggest
> > updating the whole tree instead.
> Hmmm. I do not know. Right now the cvs server is overloaded. It would
> be better to encourage people to do the minimum needed. Maybe just cvs
> update of include and lib/libc/net...
there was no problem with overload for me due to my update from mirror,
so it doesn't matter for me anyway. i really don't see a reason why
everyone updates only from the main server, that's what mirrors are for
(and should have higher priority to update cvs tree from
anoncvs.netbsd.org than regular user connections).
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\=
-- <email@example.com> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ /=
-- Microsoft proprietary formats X =
-- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \=
-- Key Fingerprint: DBEC 8BEC 9A90 ECEC 0FEF 716E 59CE B70B 7E3B 70E2 =
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----