Subject: Re: rc.local and rcorder(8)
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: Charles Shannon Hendrix <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/26/2002 00:51:22
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:45:05PM -0600, Rick Kelly wrote:
> When you do a "make upgrade" to upgrade a library, all applications that
> used that library are removed, and then the applications are supposed to
> be sucked down and rebuilt after all else is updated. I've seen applications
> removed and never rebuilt by pkg.
I have seen the same thing. The last time I took a spare machine and
did a total rebuild, a lot of things either failed to build or just
never came back after being uninstalled. It was too much a mess to fix,
so I just took that opportunity to upgrade the machine.
/usr/pkgsrc has required a lot of handholding for the last few upgrades,
and one (I thought) simple library upgrade ended up triggering bout 32
hours of rebuilding. I just put this rebuild on a spare machine and
let it go, but most of the rebuilding triggered really was not needed.
Of course, I don't really see this as pkg's fault: applications are
getting more hairy with each passing week, and the dependencies are
> Now if you look at my other systems... I generally don't redirect X
> applications across systems. I have emacs on all my systems. Well, pkg
> builds the X version. If I want the tty version I have to build it by hand.
...or you could build emacsNN-nox11 where NN is the version.
> The pkg stuff deleted postgressql while I had a running database.
I lost postgresql too. Since my database application is entirely back
burner, I didn't realize it at first. PostgreSQL is now a /usr/local/src
maintained program, though not for that reason.
> I used to have gnumeric on this system...
gnumeric has some nasty Gnome-type dependency issues that might have
caused a snag.
I think some of these problems are caused by the addition of libraries, or
even removable of them. For example, you might have this:
* library A
* library B
* library C
* program A
* program B
* program C
You upgrade library A which the other two depend on, so this triggers an
application rebuild too. But the library creator has now added library
D which the apps all use. This dependency fails to the applications
This is a common occurance with Gnome, where in the past libraries have
been created, removed, split, combined, etc.
I assume that the dependencies for the programs should have triggered an
install of library D, but it seems like this doesn't happen in some cases.
> >rc.local is just an ugly and literally unnecessary wart on its side, I
> >wouldn't expect it to go away entirely any time soon.
I actually still use this, and I don't see why it's ugly or unnecessary.
It usually is a temporary stopping point before I finish a good rc.d
script, but sometimes there really is no need for that, so things stay
I also put things in there which are not program startups, though I
suppose that could also go in rc.d.
> So, only applications from the NetBSD distribution and pkg should be allowed?
No, you can create some too.
> Microsoft is working on this.