Subject: Re: Curious SYNOPSIS in signal(3)
To: Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr>
From: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/25/2002 16:59:33
On 25 Jun 2002, Eric Jacoboni wrote:

# Also, the FreeBSD's typedef'd synopsys is somewhat clearer:
#
# /-----------------
# | typedef void (*sig_t)(int);
# |
# | sig_t
# | signal(int sig, sig_t func);
# \-----------------
#
# it could be nice to add it in the synopsis as an alternative for the
# basic syntax.

How is typedef'ing it clearer than inlining it?

				--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: The free OS with a money back guarantee!