Subject: Re: quick build.sh question
To: None <email@example.com>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/06/2002 01:48:14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 01:28:31AM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> production & -current ?
Uh... you can build snapshots of -release too. And, in many cases,
I'd have to use -current to do things I'd like to do in production.
(Never mind that policy dictates we do that with Solaris where I
> ...maybe pre-1.6, but the new system seems to circumvent this
> freebsd-style insanity by building it's own set of local tools based on
> the existing ones.
No, no, I mean binaries entirely outside of the build environment.
Like, say, Postfix. Or sed. Or are you saying you do your whole
build at single user?
> ...in my case it did not. had to run usr/sbin/etcupdate and
Good. Still scares me. :^>
> ...per Julio Merino's suggestion, it seems that the best route is to build
> once with a DESTDIR, verify your source tree builds completely, then build
> again w/o DESTDIR but w/ the -u flag, as to not clear objects, but install
> the compiled binaries.
> ...then etcupdate
> ...then usr/src/etc/postinstall
Well, I'll try that next time around then. It does sound faster.
(I'd insert a "try new kernel" step before the etcupdate. No need to
build one specifically if you've got it listed in EXTRA_KERNELS.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----