Subject: Re: libbfd [was Re: libiberty]
To: Todd Vierling <>
From: Nathan J. Williams <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/07/2002 14:12:05
"Nathan J. Williams" <> writes:

> On a related note, I recently discovered that we install libbfd as a
> full-fledged library, with .a, .so, and _pic.a versions, but we don't
> install bfd.h. Is this intentional? It doesn't seem right... either we
> should include bfd.h, or we shouldn't bother with the .a forms.

Clearly I need to clean out my system more often; I just noticed that
the .a forms aren't installed anymore.

Admittedly, that wasn't the answer I was looking for, but at least
it's consistent.

        - Nathan