You are correct it seems I'm the one who can't count. I think this
should be the correct patch (I think):

--- wiconfig.c.original Wed Apr  3 17:51:47 2002 
+++ wiconfig.c  Wed Apr  3 17:52:13 2002
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
        wreq.wi_type = WI_RID_SCAN_APS;
        wreq.wi_len = 4;
        /* note chan. 1 is the least significant bit */
-       wreq.wi_val[0] = 0x7ff; /* 1 bit per channel, 1-11 */
+       wreq.wi_val[0] = 0x3fff;        /* 1 bit per channel, 1-14 */
        wreq.wi_val[1] = 3;             /* tx rate */

        /* write the request */ 

If I'm wrong this time I have just forgotten how to do base conversions
and someone with better brains or a calculator will have to fix it. :)

--Matt

On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:00:54PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > -       wreq.wi_val[0] = 0x7ff; /* 1 bit per channel, 1-11 */
> > +       wreq.wi_val[0] = 0x7fff;        /* 1 bit per channel, 1-14 */
> 
> Either I can not count or you are now enabling channels 1-15.
> 
> Otherwise this looks good (and the additional channels are needed for parts
> of europe too)
> 
> 
> Martin

-- 
"Take away them collisions and the common channel and it's like Christianity 
 without Christ." -Jim Breen (speaking about "full-duplex" Ethernet)