On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 11:39:47AM -0500, Sean Finney wrote:
> hey all--
> 
> hope you're all not getting tired of me already :)  So, now that I have
> this working, I'd like to get ipnat working.  I've been somewhat frustrated
> in my attempts to get this working--I understood ipf/inpat to get my NAT
> set up last year when I had a standard static address on a normal DSL
> connection, but I've been unable to get it to work with my current pppoe
> setup.
> 
> My layout is something like:
> 
> net <------> (rtk0/pppoe0) my netbsd box (rtk1) <-----> internal NAT'd LAN
> 
> the lan is 192.168.0.0/0xffffff00, and rtk1 is 192.168.0.1.
> 
> i have rules of the form
> 
> map pppoe0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/16
> 
> that don't seem to work at all.  I can speak to either the lan or the
> net from the netbsd box, but the essential NAT'ing doesn't seem to be happening.
> If I understand correctly I don't want to use rtk0 as the device in the map
> list, but pppoe0 instead, right?  Also, does the ip address/submask of rtk0
> matter at all?  Should it even be set?  Anyone have an idea why this might
> not be working?  I can supply more info like the actual /etc/ipnat.conf or
> `route show` or `ìfconfig -a` if it'd be helpful.

As pppoe is a cloning device there is an issue with ipf/ipnat: at the
time the rules are loaded the interface doesn't exists.
A /etc/rc.d/ipfilter reload is enouth for me (ipf -y should do it too).

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--