Subject: Re: Why not change disk naming?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julio Merino <email@example.com>
Date: 12/30/2001 11:28:33
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:10:37PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:25:51 +0100
> From: Julio Merino <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Message-ID: <20011228202551.C728@klamath.local>
> | PD: I still think that NetBSD naming scheme is not as powerful as the
> | FreeBSD one...
> No, the NetBSD scheme is more powerful than FreeBSD's. But like many
> things with more power, it is also harder to use.
> To see the more power - imagine you have a desire to have a partition
> that spans two "slices" for whatever reason. Easy in NetBSD, impossible
> in FreeBSD. On the other hand, there's nothing that the FreeBSD scheme
> can label that the NetBSD scheme can't also label.
> The principle of the NetBSD scheme is that there is exactly one label
> that matters, and it describes how the drive is divided up. Other labels
> that might exist on the drive have (or should have) nothing at all to do
> with NetBSD - they're for some other OS to use (though tools like mbrlabel
> can make extracting info from them, and including it into the NetBSD
> label, a little easier).
Well, this seems very logic from this point of view... and interesting :)
> The other problem you had - mbrlabel scribbling on FreeBSD's label indica=
> some major fault with your installation. NetBSD shouldn't be noticing the
> FreeBSD label at all - it should simply be being ignored. (On the other
> hand FreeBSD notices and uses NetBSD labels - or did last time I tried - =
> needs to because of its "labels restricted to slices" philosophy).
> Most likely you don't have the NetBSD "slice" correctly labelled as being
> NetBSD in the MBR label - or you have the FreeBSD slice incorrectly label=
> as being NetBSD. That is, you should have one MBR type that is 165, and
> one that is 169 in the setup you have described (165 for FreeBSD, 169 for
You are forgetting that FreeBSD is on disk wd0 and NetBSD on wd1. And I've
checked and both OS'es have their MBR slice type setup properly. Remember
that I don't have a NetBSD disklabel on the first disk, nor a FreeBSD
disklabel on the second one (though FreeBSD is able to read NetBSD
Any help will be appreciated! ;)
La ignorancia es la felicidad.
Julio Merino (Slink) <email@example.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----