Subject: Re: So...about this uuchk.1 problem...
To: Dave Huang <email@example.com>
From: Nigel Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/09/2001 21:21:54
Having MKMAN=yes or MKMAN=no isn't special though. It's documented in
If something is broken then it should be documented along with the
workaround. You can't keep people guessing, although that does seem
to be the main aim of NetBSD sometimes.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:56:05PM -0600, Dave Huang wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Nigel Reed wrote:
> > This should at least be documented in the UPDATING document shouldn't it?
> > I've been trying to get this solved for almost a week now all for the sake
> > of changing a YES to a NO.
> I always thought of UPDATING as a list of things to check if your build
> breaks using the stock settings... if you have special stuff in your
> mk.conf, you're on your own :)