Subject: Re: vi broken currently?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/03/2001 12:49:30
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
[Stripping port-i386 out of this conversation, since this doesn't
seem to be machine dependant.]
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 04:12:20PM +0100, Feico Dillema wrote:
> Just drop by the office. sshd shows no sign of trouble here. started
> sshd -d -d -d, and did a ssh localhost. That went just fine.
Hrm. So we're not doing Nigel any favors. Sorry, Nigel. :^>
> I haven't noticed any other problems. Except for the bad free
> messages, also vi seems to work ok. But I haven't done any heavy usage
Yeah, I've been a little wary of editing anything important, but vi
has yet to corrupt the few files (including /usr/src/blah and
/etc/mk.conf, whoops, maybe I should have used ed ;^>) I've edited.
I'm rebuilding vi with CFLAGS+=3D-g in my /etc/mk.conf right now.
We'll see what turns up.
(If this gets ugly enough, I'll turn to electric fence. But I'm
hoping gdb will be sufficient.)
~ g r @ eclipsed.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----