On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Jared D. McNeill wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > Yeah, well, "no easy way to..." is a lot better than "not maintained at
> > all", which is basically the condition of our in-tree UUCP.  Hell, it's a
> > version behind the "latest", where that "latest" was released almost a
> > decade ago.
>
> I think what we need is a 'localsrc' tree, where we can keep maintained
> (but not part of the base system) software.
>
> Things like UUCP, sendmail, postfix, a pop3 / imap server, etc..

You mean, like "othersrc"???

Frederick