Subject: Re: UUCP removal from OpenBSD
To: Jared D. McNeill <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Frederick Bruckman <email@example.com>
Date: 09/30/2001 19:56:27
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > Yeah, well, "no easy way to..." is a lot better than "not maintained at
> > all", which is basically the condition of our in-tree UUCP. Hell, it's a
> > version behind the "latest", where that "latest" was released almost a
> > decade ago.
> I think what we need is a 'localsrc' tree, where we can keep maintained
> (but not part of the base system) software.
> Things like UUCP, sendmail, postfix, a pop3 / imap server, etc..
You mean, like "othersrc"???