In message <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109071627470.359-100000@dire.starwolf.com>,
James Graham wrote:

>Has anyone considered the possibility of implementing nested groups?
>
>i.e.
>
>wheel::0:root,adm0,adm1
>operator::5:=wheel,oper1,oper4
>
>I would find such a utility actually rather useful; is there anyone
>who finds it distasteful, particularly, and if so, why?
>

I'd rather considering a filesystem using ACLs like, ... oh BTW which
one does ? ( NTFS is not an answer :-)

-- 
Xavier HUMBERT  -  Systemes et Reseaux     |     labo-info@injep.fr
INJEP                                      |     humbert@injep.fr