Jason R Thorpe writes:
>FWIW, I really honestly think we should get LFS into a state where it's
>a "sellable" feature -- i.e. a file system thst really distinguishes us
>from other systems.  Snapshot support, "instant up after crash" (e.g.
>background fsck), etc.

While I agree that would be good, how would that be distinguishing
from FFS+softdep+snapshots?

:: Mike ::