greywolf@starwolf.com:
> To all,

> Yes, I did see the recommendation to have the compiler fixed, but as
> the compiler is much slower to get updated in the NetBSD source
> tree, I opted for a temporary fix not to optimize for this
> particular piece of the system.

OK, I accept that.

(Is there a way to set a timer that backs out from that fix
automiagically after time X? That would ensure that the word
"temporary" above is honoured. ;-)

> It sounds screwy, and I will post a bug to the compiler group (once
> I figure how...), but we need something that is not going to break
> *now*.  Named is a rather critical application.

Indeed. Without it, I would find myself unemployed. :-)

				Cheers,
				  /Liman