Subject: Re: kerberos V
To: None <aidan@kublai.com>
From: Lars-Johan Liman <liman@autonomica.se>
List: current-users
Date: 05/30/2001 07:33:00
aidan@kublai.com:
> I'd like to give you the reasons I said this, but it was a long time
> ago I made the decision, and many of my old reasons don't apply
> anymore. Thinking about this now, the reasons I don't want to are:
> * Relies on Heimdal libraries for things like argument parsing and
> network I/O. This is fine for Heimdal, but I think it's important
> to be able to build without crypto, which means I wouldn't be able
> to rely upon the existence of those functions. Or they'd need to
> be put into the non-crypto part of the tree... That'd be
> inappropriate since they're part of the Heimdal dist, and also just
> too much work for basically one utility.
That's a very good point.
> * I really don't have the time or the energy.
> You might be able to convince me the first argument isn't good enough,
> but I'm sure I won't budge on the second. :-)
No need for me to try. You convinced me. :-)
Cheers,
/Liman