Subject: Re: Advice for pci NIC
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <email@example.com>
Date: 04/21/2001 14:46:05
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
email@example.com (Martin J. Laubach) writes:
> I need to build a packet filtering box with the additional
> requirement of doing _at_least_ 100 MBit. I guess that to
> actually get that kind of performance, I need to use hand
> picked NICs instead of the cheap card du jour.
You want SMC Etherpower II NICs:
ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5001 tcp -> lyssa
ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 1.44 real seconds = 11374.44 KB/sec +++
ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.72, calls/sec = 1421.81
ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.3sys 0:01real 25% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 7541+0csw
That are two PIII@700MHz with BX boards and SMC Etherpower II NICs.
In article <20010223210903.A205@antioche.eu.org>,
Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> You may also want to look at the quad-port DLINK board (based on the
> DEC 21143 chip, I think it's the DFE620 but I'm not sure) if you're short
> in PCI slots.
No good idea. Both of my tulip cards (SMC 9334, D-Link DFE500TX) tend
to fall back to "store and forward" mode very quickly with the "tlp"
driver. And afterwards the send performance is below 8MB/Sec on a
100MBit/Full Duplex connection.
Matthias Scheler http://core.de/~tron/