>It's wrong to submit code for review to current-users; that
>belongs on tech-*. In this case, tech-net, I would say (or possibly
>tech-userlevel, but please don't send it to both).

duly noted, however i will counter with the point that the discussion
started there.

>With respect to your manpage:
>
> .Fl d
>-flag.
>+flag.  If used with
>+.Fl a
>+instead of a
>+.Ar hostname ,
>+it will delete all arp entries.
>
>this is suboptimal. You are not using it "instead of" a hostname, per
>se, you accepting it regardless of whether a hostname is specified.
>So you should probably remove the protasis of your conditional.

hmm...that's a very good point.  in fact, if someone *does* actually
use -a with a hostname, i should probably emit an error.

>I have no comment on the actual implementation ;-)

...which will subsequently be fixed.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."