Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:43:52PM -0400, maximum entropy:
> >Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:57:01 +0000
> >From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
> >
> >Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:53:19PM -0400, maximum entropy:
> >> >Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:29:06 +0000
> >> >From: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
> >> >
> >> >i'm still having trouble with ld.elf_so (on sparc), with 1.5T source
> >> >from ~last friday.  all dynamically linked executables core dump.  any
> >> >clues to as to what might cause what would appear to be an error in
> >> >relocation?  does anyone else have this problem?
> >> 
> >> Hmm...let me guess...you have LD_RUN_PATH set in your environment
> >> where you build ld.elf_so.  I reported this over a year ago, but no
> >> one seems to have looked at the PR, much less applied the simple patch
> >> I supplied...
> >
> >bingo.  that worked.  was
> >
> >LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/pkg/lib
> >
> >> http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=9284
> 
> Just to clarify, having LD_LIBRARY_PATH set is OK.  ld.elf_so will be
> built incorrectly only if LD_RUN_PATH is set.  Different variable.
> Since it worked for you, I assume you actually cleared LD_RUN_PATH to
> rebuild but typed LD_LIBRARY_PATH into your email message...

correct.  i cut the wrong line, but they are set to the same values
in my env.

> --
> entropy -- it's not just a good idea, it's the second law.