Subject: Re: large disk preformance
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jukka Marin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/08/2001 10:13:43
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:50:45PM -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> Tyrel Beede drunkenly mumbled...
> > Yeah, It would be nice if I could put the SCSI drive back in but the reason I
> > replaced it is because it crashed. Given the SCSI drive should operate faster but
> that's a shame.
> > I was just thinking that this slow down seems to be a bit odd... I was thinking it
> > might be realated to some of the UBC work and I was hoping somebody might have a
> > few tips on tuning the UBC for larger disks.
> hmmm, don't use IDE, i'm a SCSI Bigot, so i don't know what to tell you, maybe
> someone more in tune with the IDE aspect of things will be able to help you
Hmm. I have noticed that my IDE disk based systems sometimes get slow, but
this only happens when doing a massive "rm -r" or "tar" operation and then
trying to execute commands from the same disk. I'm not sure why SCSI would
make a big difference here (if the disk is seeking wildly), though. The
best thing would be to have a separate disk for the OS and another for the
data (and one for swap ;)
I don't know why vi would get slow - unless the disk is seeking and vi is
trying to save a 10 MB backup file or something.
My not-so-old Seagate Barracuda (9.1 GB SCSI) feels dead slow now that I
have 30 and 45 GB IDE disks...