Subject: Re: README: BUILD_DEPENDS semantics changed
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Alistair Crooks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/27/2001 11:12:46
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:25:24AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> [ Followups to tech-pkg, please! ]
> We have changed the BUILD_DEPENDS semantics: first component is now a
> package name+version/pattern, no more executable/patchname/whatnot.
> While there, introduce BUILD_USES_MSGFMT as shorthand to pull in
> devel/gettext unless /usr/bin/msgfmt exists (i.e. on post-1.5 -current).
> If you experience any problems, please send-pr them.
I would just like to thank Hubert for committing these changes, and
to say why they were deemed necessary:
+ libtool and xpkgwedge were previously listed as DEPENDS, rather than
BUILD_DEPENDS, since they needed the version relational matching logic.
A slight drawback of this was that, if libtool was updated and a
"make update" was run, then libtool would be updated, and all the
packages which have libtool as a pre-requisite
+ the previous logic for "match any executable in the path" isn't all
that tremendous. To illustrate, years ago, I used to have a FreeBSD
partition mounted. When making cdrecord one day, I had no end of
problems, since files weren't being built properly with gmake. In the
end, I realised that the gmake from the FreeBSD partition was being
found, and that's when pkgsrc grew the "echo the executable that was
+ the file matching logic can be done just as well using
in make(1) terms
And I'd like to thank all the pkgsrc people for bearing with me and
proof-reading the changes, and Hubert for committing the changes,
because the little time I had was used up answering mail.
And the director, the producer, oh, and my agent...