Subject: Re: xterm v. xterm-old
To: gabriel rosenkoetter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Geoff Wing <email@example.com>
Date: 02/09/2001 03:00:52
gabriel rosenkoetter wrote about Re: xterm v. xterm-old:
:On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:48:01AM +1100, Geoff Wing wrote:
:> OK, then if someone has XTerm*Foreground then they also need to
:> include the other colours under the XTerm class, not the VT100 (sub?)class.
:> Well, it worked for me (in 88b, v132 & v150) to also add the following
:> if XTerm*Foreground is set.
:You have *got* to be shitting me.
:This should not be necessary just to get reasonable behavior out of
It's not necessary. As Tom Dickey said, it's just a matter of using
the proper name for the 'foreground' resource (with a small 'f') instead
of the 'Foreground' class. Otherwise you're setting something different
to what you think.
Geoff Wing : <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Rxvt Stuff : <email@example.com>
Zsh Stuff : <firstname.lastname@example.org>