Subject: Re: kern/11627
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jarom=EDr_Dolecek?= <email@example.com>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/31/2001 16:28:13
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 10:20:15PM +0100, Jaromír Dolecek wrote:
> gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> > Rather a bad idea for machines which really *do* have multiple ISA
> > buses, don't you think?
> Is that actually possible with ISA ?
I can't think of a good example off the top of my head, but I don't
see why it wouldn't be possible to have several multiple pci busses,
each with an isa bus on them.
(Um, a backplane-based parallel-esque machine?)
I'm pretty sure if I popped a couple of PCI-to-ISA bridge cards in
my PowerMac 7500 (with a G3 card, running the macppc port), I'd want
them both recognized separately, and I don't think I'm unreasonable
to expect that.
No matter what, pinning things down in an INSTALL or GENERIC kernel
is kind of against standard practice...
~ g r @ eclipsed.net