On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:18:15PM -0700, Herb Peyerl wrote:

 >  > [I thought ccd required less overhead than raid did, but I guess you can't
 >  >  boot off a ccd...]
 > 
 > No. I haven't considered 'ccd'.  using 'raidframe' seemed like "the right
 > answer".

...and ccd doesn't do RAID1, either (you're using RAID1, right?)

 >  > That looks almost as though, for some reason, you're trying to do a loopback
 >  > mount on the fs, which I'm sure isn't what you had in mind.
 > 
 > I'm not.  straight ffs. 

Do you have have softdeps enabled?  If it's not, try enabling it.

 >  > Idea, forwarded by jmcneill:  Have you checked out the potential problems
 >  > with the UBC code?
 > 
 > No, I've not.

If it's 1.5, it's not UBC.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>