Subject: Re: MAXPARTITITONS > 8 (was: Re: mbrlabel fixes)
To: Wolfgang Rupprecht <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
Date: 01/01/2001 09:38:25
>> i'm curious...is the fsck time of two 35 gig partitions much smaller
>> than that of one 70 gig partition?
>It is if one automounts the partitions and has the good fortune to
>have only some of them mounted when the crash happens. Breaking the
>70 gigs into 8 partitions could (with good planning) set things up so
>that only one or two of them were normally mounted.
frankly speaking, using the automounter on local disks had never
occurred to me. i guess that would work...
>I don't think it helps any if one tries to parallelize the fsck's by
>assigning the same "pass" number to several partitions of the same
>physical disk. It would just slow things down by having a continual
>stream of very large seeks.
you'd have to have more than one disk for that to help...
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
firstname.lastname@example.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
email@example.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
firstname.lastname@example.org * "information is power -- share the wealth."