Subject: Re: NetBSD vs DCE/DFS, AFS?
To: Hans-Christian Becker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ken Hornstein <email@example.com>
Date: 12/20/2000 00:24:26
>This may be a totally ignorant question, but I'll ask it anyway:
>Is there any move of NetBSD in the direction of DCE/DFS and OpenAFS?
Many people (including myself) view DCE/DFS as "dead" technology. Interest
in it has waned, and nearly all of the DCE/DFS cells that I am aware of have
migrated back to AFS and/or "vanilla" Kerberos 5 (I know there are a few
holdouts, but I am skeptical that they will continue with DCE much longer).
I think the reason there is nobody is working on DCE/DFS is that few people
are using it nowadays. I think if someone did the work for DCE/DFS, it
would be interesting ... but I can't see the demand for it today. I
know of a few people working on OpenAFS, though.
>I realize that Kerberos 5 in the system is good, but are there any
>other things that should/can/are be[ing] done to make NetBSD a
>candidate for distributed file systems and -computing? My university
>(which is currently running AFS) has a few years ago taken a policy
>to migrate from AFS to DCE/DFS, and as far as I can see, only Linux
>is mentioned as fas as free platforms go.
I find it amusing that your university has been in migration to DCE for
a few years now (I take it that means at least two?) That alone should
tell you something.