Subject: Re: ex0 weird error
To: Michael L. Hitch <>
From: Peter Seebach <>
List: current-users
Date: 12/14/2000 15:38:25
In message <
>, "Michael L. Hitch" writes:
>just before the for (;;) loop.  This should result in a non-zero return
>when only the S_INTR_LATCH bit is set.

I'm willing to try possible strategies.  I have a reasonably stable source
tree, a couple of cards, and a test case that seems to semi-reliably trigger
the failure.

I'm currently trying to figure out why my fairly respectable Intel card can't
produce more than 5MB/sec on this box.