On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 11:35:44PM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> 
> >>	we do have tested DAD tons of times, including during TAHI
> >>	conformance tests, and I'm convinced it works fine.
> 
> 	- NetBSD 1.5J, i386, wi interface
> 	    wi0 at pcmcia0 function 0: MELCO, WLI-PCM-L11, Version 01.01, 
> 	     port 0x400-0x43fwi0: 802.11 address 00:60:1d:f1:86:61
> 	- NetBSD 1.5J, i386, ne interface
> 	    ne2 at pcmcia0 function 0 port 0x400-0x40f port 0x410-0x41f
> 	    ne2: SVEC/Hawking Tech. Combo Card Ethernet
> 	    ne2: Ethernet address 00:e0:98:00:30:9f
> 	- NetBSD 1.4.2 + KAME, i386, ep interface
> 	    ep1 at pcmcia1 function 0 port 0x330-0x33f: 3Com 3c589 10Mbps Ethernet
> 	    ep1: address 00:50:da:87:4b:be, 8KB byte-wide FIFO, 5:3 Rx:Tx split
> 	    ep1: 10baseT, 10base5, 10base2 (default 10baseT)
> 
> 	in all cases thief side detected the duplicate just fine.
The drivers I have seen problems are now: tlp and ex. Although, the
results with ex are mixed; one machine didn't detect duplicate,
another (almost exactly the same machine) does detect it. The
problematic ex is at my home, and I'll check a bit more into that case
when I get home again.

Feico.