Subject: Re: no RSA with openssl on m68k systems with 1.5_ALPHA2?
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
List: current-users
Date: 10/04/2000 12:45:38
itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
>
> >>Is it possilbe that rsa support only works if "pseudo-device rnd" is
> >>compiled in the kernel?
> >>
> >>At least I have it in my kernel on i386 and sparc where sshd works and don't
> >>have it in the kernel for amiga and hp300 (its not activated in GENERIC there
> >>either...). I will recompile a kernel with rnd and see if that fixes the
> >>sshd daemon, but its already late and it will take some time on m68k, so
> >>don't expect feedback that soon :)
> > i'll try using a kernel without RND device and see if your issue
> > repeats. please hold.
>
> hmm I see.
> - ssh/rsa.c:rsa_alive() calls RSA_generate_key()
> - RSA_generate_key() calls BN_generate_prime()
> - BN_generate_prime() calls BN_rand() via probable_prime()
> - BN_rand require us to have kernel random number device
> so openssh considers that we don't have RSA in the library.
>
> similarly, DH_generate_key() does not work if there's no random number
> device.
>
> I'm not sure if it is safe to allow userland-generated pseudo random
> number. it looks intentional. all I can do with confidence is to
> improve error message from ssh/sshd, to warn that you don't have random
> number device.
Don't we currently have rnd on by default in all kernels? If so, then I
think that this is perhaps the best solution.
Simon.
--
Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Sales, Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/