Subject: Re: Wireless ethernet advise requested....
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Brad Spencer <email@example.com>
Date: 10/01/2000 15:47:17
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:32:12AM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> I hadn't thought about this [or rather, I had, but I had assumed it
> would Just Work (tm)]; I suppose you've tested it and it doesn't work?
> Thinking about it, I guess the problem is that both want to be in seperate
> BSSes, and there's no way to make one join another BSS. Of course,
> this is just a software issue, which makes "glaring omission" seems
> a reasonable statement.
> On the other hand, the number of cases where you want to do this are
> relatively limitted...
And you can do something similar with NetBSD boxes :)
Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In some sense, but I don't think that NetBSD will act as a bridge. It
will route, of course, but in my case, I would rather not have to subnet
because I don't really have enough IP address space to do that.
Brad Spencer - email@example.com
http://anduin.eldar.org - & - http://mellon.ipv6.eldar.org [IPv6 only]
[finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP public key]