Thanks.

I hereby retract the posting of Mr. Cheriton's note to this group.  Sorry.

-Mike

On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Robert Evans wrote:

> > I don't know Mr. Cheriton, yet I do think he makes some interesting points.
> 
> You might like to have a look at the following document if you haven't
> seen it already (and some of the other documents about how NAT is not
> desirable in all situations).
> 
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-case-for-ipv6-06.txt
> 
> This is pretty regularly hashed out on the ipngwg (and IETF) mailing
> lists...
> 
> Cheers,
> Rob
>