Subject: Re: README: scheduler locking changes
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: James Chacon <email@example.com>
Date: 08/20/2000 20:07:11
With these changes how close are we to "big-lock" testing on a wide basis?
i.e. something you're sure won't panic 10-15 minutes into a boot :-)
>On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:12:43PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > PORT MASTERS: If I changed your port (m68k, mips, arm26, in particular)
> > please make sure the changes look sane. Note, I had to change several
> > m68k ports Idle/cpu_switch implementations to look like the newer hp300
> > version.
>I forgot to mention...
>I did NOT change the following ports:
>These ports are BROKEN until port-masters update the port. Note that
>the port may actually function, but a LOCKDEBUG kernel will panic on
>the first context switch.
> -- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>