Subject: Re: COMPAT_AOUT removal
To: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/07/2000 20:54:18
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Bill Studenmund wrote:
: I disagree. I've never heard options(4) should be limited to "normally"
: used options. Yes, "normally" used ones are more _likely_ to be in there,
: but I was not aware that was policy. :-)
For instance, SETUIDSCRIPTS (which can be a useful option, but dangerous if
the implications are not considered) is listed in options(4), but is only in
sparc's GENERIC (I put it there) and x68k's (copied partly from sparc).
-- Todd Vierling <email@example.com> * http://www.wasabisystems.com/
-- Speed, stability, security, and support. Wasabi NetBSD: Run with it.