Subject: Re: Questions regarding dump
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
Date: 07/21/2000 07:30:20
I am late on this thread (running "another obsolete technology" -- mail
over uucp), but still...
At 22:00 Uhr +0200 19.7.2000, Matthew Jacob wrote:
[NetBSD Legato client]
>But I doubt I shall ever release a server for *BSD (the agreement
>I have with Legato is a bit vague on this point, but I can assume that they'd
>be unhappy if I did), and the source will always be not available (also as per
>my agreement with Legato).
>Dump/Restore should work reasonably well, I agree, but in my opinion it's
>ready for retirement- not renovation. I also have on my list to examine the
>current state of rmt to make sure it's happy.
And the replacement for dump/restore is? I have to backup samba and
netatalk store, so I do not really trust tar/pax/cpio ("strange" chars,
path length). As you pointed out, Legato is closed, proprietary technology
and IMHO "not really" suited for your one/two machine(s) installation
Please don't "steve" things for which there is no alternative. For all I
can see, on the average NetBSD setup, dump(8)/restore(8) is here to stay.
"It's never straight up and down" (DEVO)