Subject: Re: CMU ver 2.4.3 bootp program
To: None <email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 07/19/2000 11:03:51
> I have a copy of the CMU bootp program group. [...] It successfully
> compiled on my NetBSD machine. Well, sort of. It generated a number
> of warnings, my guess is that it was looking for a true UNIX host,
> rather then a BSD anything type host to compile on.
Implying that BSD *isn't* "true UNIX", without being more precise about
what you mean by "true UNIX", is liable to garner you little but flames
> Especially since the make file called the C compiler using a well
> known alias CC, which is what the Founders called their C compiler.
Actually, the Founders called their C compiler cc, not CC. In my
experience, when CC exists it's a C++ compiler....
It's also not clear why anyone here would care about the CMU bootp
daemon when NetBSD already ships with a bootp daemon - if you have
reason to believe the stock NetBSD one is broken, you're more likely to
get helpful reactions if you explain why you think so.
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B