I have been relying on the files under /usr/share/examples/supfiles
to officially tell me what I should do.  Some time ago when I noticed
the security release evaporate I looked to see whether this was
reflected
in what I took to be the official place, but they have not changed.

So even if the template supfile I used originally still contains the
"security" release, I should remove it from the supfile I use?
Will do - thanks!

-- Ken Wellsch

Noriyuki Soda wrote:
> 
> > I thought the -security branch for sup was dead. i.e. no need to
> > separate dist anymore.
> 
> Yes, the "security" release for sup was dead.
> 
> > Tonight though on my regular sup the entire crypto tree
> > disapeared during the allsrc and reappeared when my old security sup
> > kicked in.
> 
> This was mistake, and corrected now.
> The "allsrc" release should have the crypto tree, and the "security"
> release shouldn't have it.
> 
> Please remove the "security" release from your supfile.
> If your supfile preserves the "security" release, the crypto tree
> will be removed again on next sup.
> Sorry for inconvenience.
> --
> soda