Subject: Re: increasing FD_SETSIZE to 1024 or 2048?
To: None <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: None <Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no>
List: current-users
Date: 07/08/2000 16:43:21 
> More speficially, 256 fd's in named has been a real performance
> problem for both for the research I do, and at my new job.

I'm curious what you are doing to named to cause it to consume
such vast number of FDs?  Normally it (at least in the pre-9
versions) only has a handfull (if that many) FDs open, if I'm not
gravely mistaken.

- H=E5vard