Subject: Re: increasing FD_SETSIZE to 1024 or 2048?
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/04/2000 16:20:52
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Todd Vierling wrote:
# On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, John Kohl wrote:
# : This causes problems if the calling program increases FD_SETSIZE and its
# : file descriptor process limit, and then expects high-numbered file
# : descriptors to work properly with the RPC runtime's built-in small
# : fd_sets. To make it worse, the RPC runtime exports its fd_set as a
# : global symbol the program can tweak. All callers had better use the
# : same set size!
# This is ... definitely suboptimal. This should be using poll(), and
# certainly *not* exporting a fd_set for any reason.
Is there a good reason to be using poll() instead of select()? I thought
that select() had been invented because the mechanism and concept behind
poll() was thought to be completely brain-dead.
BSD: Feed The Computer.