Subject: Re: increasing FD_SETSIZE to 1024 or 2048?
To: David Brownlee <email@example.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/03/2000 21:07:12
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 05:01:07PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> > I appreciate your'e trying to be helpful, but your answer is a bit of
> > a non-sequitur. Is there some reason _not_ to bump FD_SETSIZE, given
> > that apps can take advanatge of FD_SETSIE on the order of 1k to 2k?
> Could there be any danger when mixing old binaries and new
> libraries or vica versa?
I think this was the cited reason when this last was discussed on one of
our mailing lists...