Subject: Re: NOTICE: pcvt on its death bed
To: Alan Barrett <email@example.com>
From: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/06/2000 11:05:53
>On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
>> Is there any feature pcvt has and wscons does not ?
>Yes: the ability to run X (on i386) without options INSECURE.
The only reason that ever worked is due to some backward-compatibility
cruft in pcvt that explicitly violates the securelevel model. That's
not an acceptable reason to keep pcvt; in fact, it's another reason to
make it go away.