Subject: Re: NOTICE: pcvt on its death bed
To: Alan Barrett <>
From: Charles M. Hannum <>
List: current-users
Date: 06/06/2000 11:05:53
>On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
>> Is there any feature pcvt has and wscons does not ?
>Yes:  the ability to run X (on i386) without options INSECURE.

The only reason that ever worked is due to some backward-compatibility
cruft in pcvt that explicitly violates the securelevel model.  That's
not an acceptable reason to keep pcvt; in fact, it's another reason to
make it go away.