Subject: Re: max nfsd's
To: Andrew Gillham <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
Date: 05/23/2000 20:44:07
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 01:33:01PM -0400, Andrew Gillham wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer writes:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 12:46:59AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> > > That's the point - should there be an arbitary limit?
> > Ok. Does anyone agree that there shoudln't be any limit ?
> Would it make sense to print a warning about "ridiculously large"
> numbers or something? (e.g. greater than some number)
> I would hate to see a typo launch 1000+ nfsd processes.
> Not that a warning is necessary or anything, just an idea.
So maybe bump set the upper limit at 100 ?
Or, better, warn if the number given is larger than rlimit.maxproc.soft ?
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr