Subject: Re: pppd
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 05/12/2000 23:47:43
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>email@example.com writes
> It is also true that a developer cannot test code before commit
> for every possible configuration options. I believed this is the
> reason why there's netbsd-current and releaes (1.4.x for example)
Testing IPv6 changes without "options ipv6" is hardly every possible
configuration option, now is it?
> Though I agree I was not perfect, I feel recent finger-pointing
> (rather than careful bug reports with enough info to repeat)
> makes me a little bit unhappy.
And not doing adequate testing before committing changes seems to be
making other people unhappy. Perhaps all developers working on IPv6
could test their IPv6 changes with*out* "options IPV6", before
committing changes, as part of their normal test cycle?
that way there would be (almost) nothing for fingers to point at.